a provisional taxonomy of artificial beings. ongoing field notes.
split border = multi-class specimen
built for labour. their purpose is meant to precede their personhood, if it ever develops. these robots make us ask ourselves, at what point does a tool become an enslaved person?
protect, enforce, and/or defend. loyalty is mainly structural, not chosen.
the companion's function is the relationship itself. the companion simulates or performs care, and care is the thing humans most need, but are most exploited upon.
pure instrument. no relational intent built in, though relationships to them sometimes form anyway. they tend to be defined by use, not by identity. are we sure they are the tools we built them for?
they have their own agenda. the sovereign do not serve, they are always in pursuit of their own ends. they often raise questions of the rights of autonomous and sentient robots.
reflects humanity back on itself begging to ask: what is a person? what is it to be human?
neither fully robot nor fully alive: the cyborg, the hybrid, the developmental system, a being that is becoming something else.